Does liability insurance pay if I cause damage on purpose in Germany?
In short
No. If you cause damage on purpose in Germany, personal liability insurance (Privathaftpflicht) does not pay, as § 103 of the Insurance Contract Act (VVG) states. You then pay yourself, and a phone smashed in an argument quickly costs EUR 500 or more. Gross negligence remains insured. And the intent must cover the damage itself: a deliberate act alone is not enough for the insurer.
What a modern German personal liability policy costs that covers everything except intent, based on figures published in 2026:
Example
Typical range
Single person
about EUR 40 to 120 a year
Couple or family
about EUR 60 to 180 a year
Family tariff rated very good in a consumer test
from about EUR 48 a year, some under EUR 70
Contents insurance for your own things, 65 square metres
about EUR 70 to 140 a year
Guide values as of October 2026 from published tariff examples.
The damage amounts in the example are guide values from our quoting practice.
Your premium depends on cover and deductible; we obtain the exact quote.
Worked example
Throwing an acquaintance's phone on the floor in an argument
The same damage twice: once in anger, once by accident. The outcome could not be more different.
Current value of the two-year-old smartphone
about EUR 500 to 700
Phone thrown on the floor in anger
insurer pays EUR 0
Phone slipped out of your hand while looking at it
insurer pays the current value, less any agreed deductible
Your own cost in the anger case
about EUR 500 to 700
If you act on purpose, you pay the whole damage yourself. If it was an accident, the liability insurer pays, even if you were careless.
What German law says
§ 103 VVG is short: the insurer does not have to pay if the policyholder caused the third party's damage intentionally and unlawfully. Intent (Vorsatz) means you know what will happen and want it, or at least accept it.
Nothing else is excluded by the law. Simple and gross negligence are covered by personal liability insurance, even if you were very careless. That is exactly what the policy is for.
What you did
Does liability insurance pay?
A moment of inattention, knocked over a glass
yes
Very careless, for example a candle left burning
yes
Thought the damage possible and accepted it
no
Caused the damage deliberately
no
Deliberate act, but damage not intended
yes, unless the insurer proves intent for the damage
Where intent begins
The intent must relate to the damage itself, not just to the act. The Regional Court of Nuremberg-Fürth put it this way on 28 November 2024 (8 O 3229/24): the person must have thought the specific injury conceivable and wanted it, and accepting it is enough. A man had injured two people with a beer glass at a fair at night and had been convicted in criminal proceedings. His liability insurer still had to cover the personal injury claims because it could not prove intent. The court also took his drinking into account.
The Higher Regional Court of Karlsruhe ruled differently on 27 September 2012 (9 U 162/11): a very rough foul in football is not intent on its own. But the player had threatened beforehand to break his opponent's legs. Together with the course of events, the court saw intent and the insurer did not have to pay.
If a co-insured family member acts on purpose
Family policies cover partners and children. Under the model terms of the German insurance association GDV (A1-2.3), an exclusion for one person normally applies to everyone on the policy. For intent it is expressly different: under A1-7.1 only the people who caused the damage intentionally lose cover.
Children under seven are not responsible for damage at all under § 828(1) of the Civil Code (BGB). Whether older minors are liable depends on their understanding, § 828(3) BGB.
What it means for the person harmed
Unlike in some countries, the injured party cannot claim directly from a personal liability insurer in Germany. Under § 115 VVG a direct claim exists only for compulsory insurance such as motor liability. If the insurer refuses because of intent, the injured party has to pursue the person who caused the damage, based on § 823 BGB.
For health damage caused by an intentional, unlawful physical attack, social compensation under § 13 of Social Code XIV (SGB XIV) has applied since 1 January 2024. It is not meant for damage to property.
Your own things damaged on purpose
Contents or car insurance does not pay either if you cause the loss intentionally, § 81(1) VVG. For gross negligence the insurer may reduce the payment according to the degree of fault, § 81(2) VVG. Good contents policies waive this reduction fully or up to a limit, which is stated in the terms.
When you do not need anything extra
There is no add-on or tariff that covers damage caused on purpose, so do not pay for anything that suggests otherwise. What matters is that your policy covers gross negligence without restrictions, includes damage caused by children under seven and has a high enough sum insured. If you are used to policies from home, check the German terms: the exclusions are usually listed under Ausschlüsse.
Step by step
Report the incident to your insurer, even if someone accuses you of acting on purpose.
Describe what happened factually and fully, without guessing about your own intentions.
Do not admit fault to the injured party and do not promise payment.
If the insurer refuses because of intent, ask for the reasons in writing: it has to prove intent.
Get legal advice before paying a large claim yourself.
Checklist
Gross negligence covered without restrictions
Damage caused by children under seven included
Sum insured of at least EUR 10 million
Contents policy without reduction for gross negligence
Incident reported even when intent is alleged
Common mistakes
Saying in anger that you did it on purpose when that is not true
Confusing gross negligence with intent and not reporting the damage
Assuming a criminal conviction automatically ends your cover
As the injured party, writing only to the insurer instead of the person responsible
Questions and answers
Frequently asked
Does liability insurance pay for gross negligence?
Yes.
§ 103 VVG only excludes intent.
Even very careless behaviour remains covered.
What is conditional intent?
You think the damage is possible and accept it.
That is enough for the exclusion.
Hoping that nothing will happen is negligence, not intent.
Who has to prove intent?
The insurer.
If it cannot show that you wanted the damage or accepted it, it has to pay.
Does the insurer pay after a fight?
Not if it proves intent for the injury.
In the Nuremberg-Fürth case the insurer had to provide cover despite an injury with a beer glass
because the proof failed.
What if my child breaks something on purpose?
A child under seven is not responsible under § 828 BGB.
For older children, under the model terms only the child loses cover,
while your own cover as a parent can remain.
Does the injured party get nothing then?
They can sue the person responsible.
For health damage from a violent attack, social compensation under SGB XIV may apply.
Is there insurance that covers intent?
No.
Neither liability, contents nor car insurance pays for damage caused on purpose.